Since 1938 there has been 17 film and television adaptations of Pride and Prejudice. Not including “sequels,” these traditional and modern renditions spark debate among fans, resulting in lively discourse over which is definitively the best version. We all have favorite portrayals of our adored Elizabeth Bennet and the haughty Mr. Darcy as well as other characters. Some of those favorites exist in different productions which we wish we could “mash” together in the ultimate Pride and Prejudice mash-up! With that in mind, I’ve chosen five productions of Pride and Prejudice from which I culled five noteworthy performances. Ranging from the classic to the contemporary, each offers unique perspectives of Jane Austen’s classic novel.
Related Post: P & P and Zombies: Everything You Could Ever Want
The films: MGM’s 1940 production starring Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier, the BBC 1995 version starring Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firth, Miramax Films’ 2004 Bride and Prejudice starring Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Martin Henderson, Focus Features’ 2005 classic starring Keira Knightly and Matthew Macfadyen, and last, but certainly not least, Sony Pictures’ 2016 Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (PPZ) starring Lily James and Sam Riley.
Of course, no comparison is worth its salt unless it features Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. In addition, I’ve chosen three additional characters who are central to the story. By no means are my choices the definitive answer to “who played it best” but rather, a subjective starting point for a conversation over the world’s most popular novel. After all, can we truly ever tire of discussing Pride and Prejudice?
5 Versions, 5 Characters: The Best of Pride and Prejudice in Film and Television
#1 Mrs. Bennet
“She was a woman of mean understanding, little information, and uncertain temper. When she was discontented she fancied herself nervous. The business of her life was to get her daughters married; its solace was visiting and news.”
Ah, the antics of a busybody mother with no other purpose in life than to see her daughters married and married well. Mrs. Bennet’s frivolous nature is a source of affectionate embarrassment for Elizabeth, exasperation for her husband, and often the topic of conversation among the Bingleys and Mr. Darcy.
Mary Boland was delightful in her interpretation although she was not so silly as she could have been. Alison Steadman, on the other hand, brought Mrs. Bennet to life beautifully. The shrill voice, crass manners, and plotting were executed with aplomb. Nadira Babbar’s Mrs. Bakshi was an enjoyable twist to the character. The result was an excellent blend of cultural traditions with the classic story, shying just short of over-characterization. Brenda Blethyn’s Mrs. Bennet was quieter and more genteel. Nevertheless, her restraint did not detract from the expected flightiness but rather lent Mrs. Bennet an unassuming air that was endearing. Finally, there was Sally Phillips. Having raised five daughters to slaughter zombies, Phillips’ Mrs. Bennet balanced the pride of her daughters” accomplishments as independent women with the desire to see them married and settled.
Who Played it Best
It truly is difficult to find fault with any of these portrayals. However, based on Jane Austen’s descriptions, one did outshine the others. For the reasons described above, Steadman’s fickle Mrs. Bennet wins the day.
#2 Lady Catherine de Bourgh
“Her air was not conciliating, nor was her manner of receiving them, such as to make her visitors forget their inferior rank. She was not rendered formidable by silence; but whatever she said was spoken in so authoritative a tone as marked her self-importance…”
‘Formidable’ aptly describes Lady Catherine. Her air of superiority comes from her social status. She uses it with purpose so that others feel at a disadvantage. Further, Lady Catherine’s opinions demand adulation and adoption without question. As the foil to Elizabeth’s own romantic desires, the character of Lady Catherine is important. She appears infrequently and thus her presence must be felt all the more for it.
Related Post: P & P (1995) – A 20th Anniversary Review
Edna May Oliver’s interpretation in 1940 began with potential until it departs abruptly from the novel. The idea of Lady Catherine secretly playing matchmaker is difficult to believe. Barbara Leigh-Hunt’s portrayal in the BBC production is more traditional. Her affected, nasal tone simply reeks with superiority. Marsha Mason’s Catherine was written as Darcy’s mother in Bride and Prejudice. To this end, a parent’s interest in her son’s love life was more authentic. Unfortunately, Mason did not capitalize on her limited screen time to drive home her aversion to Lalita.
Dame Judi Dench’s Lady Catherine was perfectly supercilious. Her mere presence alone was arresting. Plus, her authoritative, brisk manner of speaking left no room for argument, not that anyone, but Elizabeth, would dare! Lena Headey’s character in PPZ was equally formidable, achieved from her skill on the battlefield. She wasn’t exactly against Elizabeth. Instead, there was a grudging acceptance and appreciation of Elizabeth’s skills.
Who Played it Best
While I adore Judi Dench and her performance, I believe she was memorable simply because she is Judi Dench. As a result, Barbara Leigh-Hunt’s sniffing and rolling “r’s” give her the edge as the most perfectly, snobbish Lady Catherine.
#3 Mr. Collins
“His air was grave and stately, and his manners were very formal. He had not long been seated before he complimented Mrs. Bennet on having so fine a family of daughters; said he heard much of their beauty, but in that, in this instance, fame had fallen short of the truth….This gallantry was not much to the taste of some of his hearers…..Mr. Bennet’s expectations were fully answered. His cousin was as absurd as he hoped….”
The awkward, ingratiating nature of this character is perfect comedic relief in Pride and Prejudice. Mr. Collins’ obsequious nature as it relates to his superiors contrasts greatly with Elizabeth. He is written as having little education and lacking common sense. Still, what truly marks the character is his air of self-importance and sense of entitlement. Unfortunately, Melville Cooper’s 1940s version did not quite capture Mr. Collins’ effusive manner. He came across as too genteel and refined.
Nitin Ganatra’s Mr. Kohli in Bride and Prejudice was hilarious while insufferable. Exactly as intended, it was a well-done caricature of Mr. Collins. Still, while Cooper and Ganatra’s versions fit with the tone of their respective adaptations, they don’t quite do Mr. Collins justice.
Conversely, David Bamber gave us a delightful blend of an anxious and overly-solicitous Mr. Collins in the BBC’s adaption. His patronizing smiles, carefully crafted compliments, and servile manners were typical Mr. Collins. Equally wonderful was Tom Hollander in the 2005 Pride and Prejudice. His eagerness to please, hidden beneath a guise of solemn dignity, was unexpectedly amusing. Lastly, there is Matt Smith’s portrayal of Parson Collins in PPZ. Smith’s depiction of a man completely unaware of his ridiculousness is charming. Smith’s Mr. Collins was perfectly pompous amidst the carnage of a 19th-century zombie apocalypse.
Who Played it Best
Hands down, Matt Smith takes the cake with his portrayal of Mr. Collins. Seriously, the dance scene alone sealed the deal! Need convincing? Check out some of his best moments here.
#4 Elizabeth Bennet
“….for she had a lively, playful disposition, which delighted in anything ridiculous……there was a mixture of sweetness and archness in her manner which made it difficult for her to affront anybody; and Darcy had never been so bewitched by any woman as he was by her.”
The most beloved protagonist of all Jane Austen’s heroines, Elizabeth Bennet is intelligent and independent. Her imperfections attract readers across generations. The women that brought Elizabeth to life each honored the character in unique and memorable ways.
Even so, Greer Garson brought a haughtiness to Elizabeth, capturing her pride in every look she shot Mr. Darcy’s way. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan’s barb-slinging Lalita in Bride and Prejudice was more direct. Her dislike of Darcy was obvious and upfront. Consequently, it was equally obvious when her feelings began to change. Jennifer Ehle’s classic take highlighted Elizabeth’s lively wit and warm relationship with her sister, Jane. Ehle’s Elizabeth always appeared ready to smile, her eyes sparkling with merriment at whatever thoughts she was having.
Keira Knightley’s portrayal of Elizabeth was more reserved. However, this only served to highlight her moments of playfulness. Her laughter and smile took her from serious to utterly charming. Also, there was a sense of self-reflection that was deeply touching. To that end, her feelings are never in question. Finally, there was Lily James rendition of Elizabeth. A great deal could have gone wrong with a sword-wielding Elizabeth. Nonetheless, James beautifully balanced Elizabeth’s classic characterization with a battle-ready fearless version.
Who Played it Best
None of these interpretations are inferior to the other. Jennifer Ehle held the title for 10 years. Her version was incomparable until Keira Knightley. Admittedly, their portrayals are different and difficult to compare. Still, Keira Knightley’s deeply sensitive portrayal just edges out Jennifer Ehle.
#5 Mr. Darcy
“…..Mr. Darcy soon drew the attention of the room by his fine, tall person, handsome features, noble mien….the ladies declared he was much handsomer than Mr. Bingley, and he was looked at with great admiration for about half the evening…..His character was decided. He was the proudest, most disagreeable man in the world…..”
The epitome of tall, dark, and handsome! That is Mr. Darcy and the field of actors are certainly not lacking in that department. Each of these men brought the lofty Mr. Darcy to life in fine fashion. While Laurence Olivier’s portrayal was indeed proud and remote, his reversal in opinion was too quickly achieved. There was no build-up to his admiration of Elizabeth for viewers to become emotionally invested. Colin Firth’s traditional interpretation was more on point. Each meeting with Elizabeth captured Darcy’s struggle as he found himself reluctantly falling for a woman with “inferior connections.”
Martin Henderson’s portrayal of Mr. Darcy was missing something from the beginning. Henderson’s Darcy was not equal to Bachchan’s Elizabeth. Thus, she outshone him in every scene. Entirely unexpected, however, was the quiet depth and passion of Matthew Macfadyen. It was his eyes. They revealed his innermost thoughts at just the right moments. Above all, those long, smoldering looks he gave Elizabeth were sigh-inducing.
This brings us to Sam Riley’s Darcy. It’s hard to imagine Darcy fighting zombies. Nevertheless, Riley’s portrayal of Mr. Darcy was a faithful interpretation. He maintained the pride and reserve the character is known for. In the end, his surrender to Elizabeth was all the more charming and sensitive.
Who Played it Best
It would certainly be difficult to choose the best Mr. Darcy if Colin Firth and Matthew Macfadyen had not soared immediately to the top. Without a doubt, Colin Firth is a fan favorite. Even so, Matthew Macfadyen portrayal snuck into reluctant hearts. Of course, Firth’s Mr. Darcy diving into the lake was indeed swoon-worthy. Even so, Macfadyen’s Mr. Darcy professing his love in driving rain was its equal. To choose seems almost unfair. Ultimately, I find the dreamy more brooding portrayal of a man tortured by his reluctant heart was best captured by Matthew Macfadyen.
So, there you have it! A list of “who did it best” from the perspective of a life-long fan of almost every production of Pride and Prejudice.
Which actors portrayed your favorite version of a beloved character from Pride and Prejudice? Share below!
ARE YOU A ROMANCE FAN? FOLLOW THE SILVER PETTICOAT REVIEW:Our romance-themed entertainment site is on a mission to help you find the best period dramas, romance movies, TV shows, and books. Other topics include Jane Austen, Classic Hollywood, TV Couples, Fairy Tales, Romantic Living, Romanticism, and more. We’re damsels not in distress fighting for the all-new optimistic Romantic Revolution. Join us and subscribe. For more information, see our About, Old-Fashioned Romance 101, Modern Romanticism 101, and Romantic Living 101.
10 thoughts on “5 Versions, 5 Characters: The Best of Pride and Prejudice in Film and Television”
Prepare for a very long comment 😉 And, deep breath…
Yes, Pride and Prejudice is a never-ending source of delight for us all! In all its many incarnations. I have a particular fondness for the 2005 Mrs. Bennet. Her “Everybody behave naturally” is forever engraved in my heart. My favourite, however is Felicity Montagu’s version in the play that travelled across the UK in
2016/2017. She was so good, that she outshone every other character and made P&P about herself rather than Lizzie and Darcy. It was the first time I enjoyed the interactions between the parents and Mr. Collins more than the main couple! I had never been so invested in a Mrs. Bennet before. She was so wonderfully over the top that she was just right.
My favourite Mr. Collins was also Matt Smith, however I can’t help but doubt that he was truly the best Mr. Collins. He was simply too charming and likeable. As hilarious as Mr. Collins is in the book, I always imagined an air of unpleasantness about him as a character. That is just not the case when watching Matt
Smith’s portrayal. One cannot help but love him, but that could be the Doctor Who fan in me speaking.
I also felt that Colin Firth was the truer Mr. Darcy, particularly in the way he was less open in showing his affection for Lizzie. The 2005 film is absolutely wonderful, but it always felt like a big deviation from the book, so it always lacked something as an actual adaptation for me, personally. In fact, I love it as a story that
stands on its own. However I love the 1995 version for how true it stayed to the original source material and characters.
Thank you for sharing this article! It was a lot of fun 🙂
The 1995 and 2005 versions are definitely a source of great debate! It is far easier to stay truer to the source material when you have multiple episodes to tell the story. Both took liberties in their interpretation, refocusing the narrative on different aspects than the book. Of course, for the sake of a movie, that’s often necessary. The 2005 version actually changed the timeline to the period when the book was written vice published and then the 1940 version moved it ahead by YEARS, in order to have more elaborate costumes (and reuse costumes from Gone with the Wind!).
I’ve never seen Doctor Who (scandal!) so I really had nothing to compare Matt Smith’s performances to. It’s hard to give a definitive answer to anything so subjective! 😉
Sorry, no. I actually agree on all other comparisons on this site, but my heart will always and forever belong to Ehle and Firth! I remember I almost crawled under the seat while watching the 2005 cinema version, brrr. True, Matthew Macfadyen is really sexy, but Keira Knightley as one of my favorite heroines? Never! I could hardly recognize the character in that sullen face. I will stick with the 1995 version 😉
PS. As a stand alone romantic movie that has nothing to do with p&P I think I could enjoy the 2005 version, but it really does not give justice to the source material.
exactly, i 100% agree. Also the scene when Darcy meets Elizabeth’s eyes after she ends the conversation about Wickham when his sister is present is unbeatable. Colin Firth played Darcy with way more subtlety which is how it should be.
Yes! Thank you, Alexia! And I totally agree – that look sends shivers down my spine every time! 🙂
Having seen all of these, and having written my Masters Thesis on “Pride and Prejudice,” I am utterly shocked that the greatest adaptation of all, the 1980 BBC, is so neglected here. Gay Weldon’s adaptation is at once the funniest, most literate, and faithful of all “P&P” screenplays. Elizabeth Garvie was sheer perfection as Lizzie, and Judy Parfitt’s Lady Catherine de Bourgh was sublime, and there was never a sexier or more supercilious Darcy than David Rintoul.
Jane Austen would have despised the 2005; what an embarrassment. Lousy script, far too 21st century in sensibilities, and the big, oafish Mr McFadyen, with his ludicrous pseudo-Roman coiffure, is the worst Darcy of all time.
Do you have a list of all 17 adaptations? I would like find one that I remember watching about 20 years ago. It was in color– probably from the 1970s or 180s, but was NOT the 1980 version listed above. I so wish I could find it!!
That’s a great idea for a list. I’ll look into it and see if I can find the Pride and Prejudice you’re talking about. Could it be the 1967 adaptation? That seems very possible. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0155051/?ref_=nm_flmg_wr_58
Knightley is the worst of the five. Only someone who doesn’t understand Austen’s work would think otherwise.
It’s all subjective, and we all read Austen’s books differently. So, I disagree that you can’t appreciate Knightley and understand Austen.