Jessica Jørgensen | Dec 15, 2017 | 6
The Phantom of the Opera (2004) Film Review – A Feast for the Eyes and the Heart
We may receive a small commission if you purchase an item using an affiliate link on this post.
The Phantom of the Opera (2004)
I vividly remember my first exposure to The Phantom of the Opera. My family was in New York and my father took us all to see the show on Broadway. We also watched the equally famous Les Miserable that same trip. But as much as I loved the message, it was not Les Miserable which stuck with me. For weeks, I was haunted by the story of the Phantom. The music replayed continuously in my mind and I couldn’t let go of all the questions that the stage production left open-ended. Most importantly, what happened to the Phantom?!
Based on the French novel by Gaston Leroux, The Phantom of the Opera has been adapted many times. But it is Andrew Lloyd Webber’s stage and film musical which is arguably the most familiar to audiences.
In Webber’s version, the orphaned Christine Daae has been raised in a Parisian opera house where she also works as a dancer. But she has secretly been taking voice lessons from a tutor she only knows as the Angel of Music. When an accident occurs during rehearsal, Carlotta, the resident soprano, refuses to sing for opening night. This serves as Christine’s big break. She is a big success. This also brings her to the attention of the new patron of the opera house and her former childhood sweetheart, Raoul the Vicomte de Chagny.
Her public success and meeting with the Vicomte motivate her mysterious tutor to finally reveal himself to her as the Phantom of the Opera. He is not the ghost that the company thinks he is, but a highly disfigured man (both physically and emotionally) who lives beneath the opera house. But in spite of his kindness to Christine, the Phantom is a man to be feared. He will stop at nothing both to dictate the management of the opera house itself and to possess the lovely and innocent Christine.
These two goals put him on a direct collision course with Raoul and the managers of the opera. Christine herself remains conflicted. She loves Raoul, yet feels grateful to the Phantom. Plus, her ability to view him with compassion, as few people ever have, gives her empathy for a man whose physical violence continues to escalate. Who will win the battle for control of the opera house? Even more importantly, who will win the battle for Christine?
Comparing the Film and Stage Production
Although there have been numerous productions of The Phantom of the Opera, it is inevitable that the main comparisons will be between Andrew Lloyd Webber’s stage production and the film. One of the things I really appreciated about the film version is that it answered some of the questions left open by the stage version. The film provides a flashback into the Phantom’s origin story as well as flash-forwards into the future. So the questions I had about who the Phantom was and what happened to him after he disappeared were partially answered.
One strength that the film has over the stage production is that it has both a broader and narrower scope to tell this famous story. The benefit of the camera allows for a more detailed backdrop. For example, we are able to see the detailed behind the scenes workings of an opera house. This is not as easily produced for the stage. So we get a much better sense of place for the setting. But then the camera is also able to provide close-ups of certain scenes and faces. This creates a certain intimacy that is just not available in a theater production.
The Phantom of the Opera Film Review
The production aspects of The Phantom of the Opera are stellar. The screen is filled with lush color, intricate settings, and stunning visual shots. It is a feast for the eyes almost too rich to consume. Furthermore, the song and dance numbers are beautifully choreographed. The costumes are creative and well suited to each character. Christine is normally clothed in virginal white which creates an obvious contrast with Carlotta, the opera diva who is draped in garish, vibrant colors.
The parts were also well cast. Minnie Driver plays the opera’s soprano diva as a delightfully over the top cliche. Emmy Rossum is perfect as the young, naive Christine Daae who becomes enthralled by the Phantom. Christine is not a character which has a lot of personality. It is a part which serves more as a contrast and emotional pinboard for the other characters. But Rossum plays that wide-eyed naivete with ease, while also managing to portray Christine’s fear, longing, grief and conflicted thinking. Not to mention, Rossum’s singing voice is as pure and beautifully crystal clear as her character.
Gerard Butler gives the Phantom a sexy rock star edge which is unique to this film. This was an intentional choice by Webber and one which I think helps to update his character to appeal to modern audiences.
There are many other talented familiar faces filling supporting roles which the viewer will be happy to see, including; Miranda Richardson, Patrick Wilson, Ciaran Hinds, Simon Gallow and Kevin McNally among them.
Of course, the music is certainly one of the highlights of both the film and the stage production. It is in equal measures alluring, haunting, eerie, quiet and soaring. From the romantic All I Ask of You to the jarring opening notes of Don Juan Triumphant, it creeps inside your heart. It is the music which makes Webber’s version of this classic tale so memorable.
In addition to being a romanticized musical, this is one of the few versions of The Phantom of the Opera that is not framed as a horror story. Yes, it is true. Most of the other versions envision the story as a horror film. This is probably more true to the author’s original intent. The Phantom has always been a villain. But Webber’s vision allows Christine and the viewer to empathize with a man whose cruel past has shaped him into a person who relies on violence and manipulation to get what he wants.
As much as I love The Phantom of the Opera, I do think it has a few flaws. One of the main issues I have with this story is the character of Raoul, the Vicomte. He is the other side of the love triangle involving the Phantom and Christine. He also acts as her rescuer or knight in shining armor. The only problem is that Raoul is boring. If he is the rescuing knight, then his armor is rather dull. Although he is probably an equal match for Christine who has little personality of her own, he is no match for the charismatic Phantom. The battle between the Phantom and Raoul is for Christine’s soul. Yet Raoul himself feels soul-less. Having seen both the film and stage versions, it’s not the fault of the actor, rather the bland way his character is written.
The other complaint I have is that the film gives no explanation for how the Phantom comes by his many skills and resources. Yes, he demands payment from the managers, so he has the money to acquire what he needs. But that doesn’t answer how he trades money for knowledge and possessions.
The Phantom is lauded as a musical genius, but how did that develop? He sword fights and is a master of illusion. He has developed a vast underground network below the opera house, he reads and writes and is able to engage in games of wit successfully. All of this requires some kind of education and training. Yet Madame Giry confesses that he has exclusively lived in the opera house since his childhood and has never left. The film does a poor job of explaining the Phantom. However, in the original story, his background is much more varied and nomadic. Including even a small portion of the novel’s backstory on the Phantom would have made his history in the film more credible.
Overall, either version of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Phantom of the Opera is an unforgettable experience. The story, the music, the characters and Webber’s own vision for Leroux’s original novel has made it a beloved classic which will steal your heart.
Content Note: Rated PG-13 for sensuality and violence
Where to Watch: Rent from Amazon, Apple and Google Play. Purchase on DVD (affiliate link).
Photo Credits: Warner Bros. Pictures
“The stuff that dreams are made of.”
“In vain have I struggled. It will not do. My
feelings will not be repressed. You must allow me
to tell you how ardently I admire and love you.”